-  [WT]  [Home] [Manage]

[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts]
Posting mode: Reply
Name
Email
Subject   (reply to 289)
Message
Captcha
File
Password  (for post and file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, M4A, MID, MP3, OGG, PNG, RAR, SWF, WAV, ZIP
  • Maximum file size allowed is 1000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 209 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2012-05-14 Show/Hide Show All

File 132364475699.jpg - (58.82KB , 384x288 , Tinker_Tailor_Soldier_Spy_Poster.jpg ) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
289 No. 289
I just got back from watching 'Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy'. Never read the book or seen the 70s miniseries that was made from it. I have to say, the new movie is very good. It's very quiet. There's a lot of thinking in the sense of subtle cues that the director gives that makes you wonder how things fit in. A man will be sitting talking to someone, and a blurry figure in the background will quietly walk in, sit down and look at the man. It's stuff like this that is subtle enough to miss because it's framed as just background movement; the viewer doesn't immediately think it's important. The director, however, wants the viewer to understand that there are important details that are going to be missed if you're not observant.

Not a lot of action in this one, but a very good spy mystery. There's a figure that's discussed in the film that isn't seen but somehow managers to capture everyone's attention the moment his name is brought up. That's the type of film this is. The characters are putting pieces together, and the audience is putting together the pieces of the characters together. By the end of the film, it's all come together and works.
>> No. 311
I saw this last night, and I thank you for the heads-up about subtle things that might seem insignificant. I found myself making mental notes about little things that seemed to be highlighted for no apparent reason. Later on something would be said and I'd immediately understand what the purpose of these small cues was.

I am a bit confused as to who "Karlov" is; I thought at the beginning he was head of the circus until Percy staged the overthrow of sorts. After than point, the character seems to disappear from the story, but the name persists heavily.

Also, am I correct that the culprit and Jim were old friends? I couldn't quite tell if it was them in the photo together.
>> No. 312
The person you're referring to as "Karlov" is actually "Karla". He's the one Smiley talking about having met in when he was having a drink with his colleague. The film is based off the first book in a trilogy. During that entire series Karla is never seen or dealt with directly until the last few pages of the last book. He's Smiley's unseen equal opposite.

The other two you were referring to are indeed old friends. In the book it's implied they were lovers in the past. In the film, no mention is made, but... do you remember the party flashback towards the end of the film where they smile? Kind of colors the scene that came after with those two doesn't it? Of course, that wasn't the only reason for what happened to.. well.. happen.

Oddly enough, the one character clearly identified as homosexual in the film is in fact straight in the book. The filmmakers made the switch to emphasize the theme of secrets, weaknesses and manipulation.
>> No. 318
I was given a DVD set of the tv series this is based on for Christmas. It's got Alec Guinness in it, but I'm not sure I've got time to watch it.
>> No. 320
It's more in-depth, for sure. It's been said that making the movie was like cramming an elephant into a teacup.
>> No. 431
>>320

Damn.
[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts]


Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason  




Inter*Chan Imageboard Top List