>>
|
No. 406
I have a book, the SAS survival guide, and I've got a go-bag in case of natural disasters. I haven't practiced any of the techniques in the book, but I would try to enter the forests around where I live and do what I can to survive.
Because the forests are anywhere from an hour away to two hours away depending, I would have to base short-term survival on the ability to navigate through the city. Since this was a scenerio where people die as opposed to war or disaster, it's safe to say that freeways would still be available.
I still need to pick up books on local plant life and what is edible and what is not. I also still need to pick up emergency foodstuffs to put in my go-bag. There's an army surplus store by where I live. Assuming I didn't get everything I needed in time, I would raid that store for supplies of various kinds. There are at least two gun stores that I'm aware of on the way. I would raid them as well. There are, of course, supermarkets, where I can pick up canned food and whatnot.
I imagine my lifespan would be very short. I can only carry so much and my car is only so large, so after the initial hoarding is done, I will have to master several skills quickly, which would be difficult to do under pressure. In addition, where I live there are natural predators. With the sudden reduction of people, wildlife would flourish, but that also means predators would grow in number. They wouldn't have to struggle as much for food, but their numbers mean I would have to be skilled in fending them off or avoiding them.
While, reasonably, I could seek out a community and stay with them for protection, I'm weary enough of the human race, that I would rather go out on my own even though my chances of survival would drop like a rock. Nevertheless, I would have some peace of mind. I would probably identify a local community to go to in case I changed my mind, but I wouldn't make contact until I was ready to do so.
|