-  [WT]  [Home] [Manage]

[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
Name
Email
Subject   (reply to 34)
Message
Captcha
File
Embed   Help
Password  (for post and file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: 7Z, GIF, JPG, PDF, PNG, RAR, TXT, ZIP
  • Maximum file size allowed is 1000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 16 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2012-05-14 Show/Hide Show All

File 13453995188.jpg - (68.00KB , 500x335 , Conscripts (1).jpg ) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
34 No. 34
I’ve been thinking about the priming affect of all the complicated psychological baggage people take into studies. I mean, everyone is so unique. How do they make broad generalisations about humans???????? Can somebody explain? I think they should take the participants of lots of different research trials and they get them to do a new study and then analyse by background of that..........unique knowledge on actions, and unique understanidng of knowledge (real or percieved) on actions
>> No. 36
What you are asking is something that would make a study so broad that it would be ineffective in measurement. I think you would learn more from reading literature concerning a broad series of academic studies concerning this topic and constructing a conceptual paper as a precursor for something much more well structured. Good luck!


Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason  




Inter*Chan Imageboard Top List