This is Google's cache of http://test.789chan.org/psy/res/157.html. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on Jun 14, 2012 08:49:53 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more

Text-only version
 
-  [WT]  [Home] [Manage]

HEY EVERYONE YOU SHOULD CHECK OUT THIS THREAD, AND THIS ONE, AND THIS ONE!


[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
Name
Email
Subject   (reply to 157)
Message
File
Password  (for post and file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 5883 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 76 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2012-03-22 Show/Hide Show All

File 132732664439.jpg - (52.73KB , 450x600 , 1324961856700.jpg ) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
157 No. 157
Imagine you are fine example of a non-sociopathic clever man (real clever, not internet or egotistical [hopefully!] clever) who has a special interest in manipulation and social control/engineering. You have honed your skills and studied a selection of knowledge from the field enough to regard yourself with some awe. You lack one distinct skill set where it is apparent, your general skills and 'cross over' does not work very well. You feel helpless, relative to your general power high, in this area. It would not be a problem except that this pursuit for manipulation has become an obsession, more than a hobby, over time. You do not use your skills maliciously.
This particular 'area', or 'proof' of your abilities, is the ability to position people. No, not figuratively, but literally. To get people to stand in a group, without verbal prompting and tricks that stem from that, but rather, more intuitively. Where people are positioned in say a room, when you enter as a group and everyone sits where they will. Without planning before hand (say, by allocating seats), I am absolutely dumbstruck about how I would do this. Would any of you ladies or gentlemen of my calibre or a higher order care to enlighten me? Those who do not believe such things to be possible are forgiven for their disbelieve. I would not believe it either, had I not gently eased then consumed in the pursuit of this game. If this post means nothing to you, that is fine. I won't be taking questions, which often seems to be the case when I mention this game , because I just want a discussion on topic.
>> No. 158
You'd probably want to analyse the group's dynamics to some extent first in my humble opinion. I suggest this on the basis that intra-group relationships may dictate a workable pattern that you could exploit. This would mean that you wouldn't have to "position" individuals, and thus making overall success easier.

I admit I haven't yet tried this game, but you've piqued my interest. The challenge has been set, and I'll be darned if I'll help out the competition anymore than this.
>> No. 182
The content of the room would also be important. If no one had any investment in the room (say, a class that people were meeting in once) that would change the dynamic highly as opposed to where people keep their personal objects. That is also a huge factor.


Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason  




Inter*Chan Imageboard Top List